SA Newsletter Jan 1997
Sustainable Agriculture Newsletter
- SA Newsletter Archive
- SA Newsletter Issue 1 2017
- SA Newsletter -- Fall 2016
- SA Newsletter Spring 2016
- SA Newsletter Winter 2016
- SA Newsletter Spring 2015
- SA Newsletter Fall 2015
- SA Newsletter Summer 2015
- SA Newsletter Fall 2014
- SA Newsletter Spring 2014
- SA Newsletter Fall 2013
- SA Newsletter Spring 2013
- SA Newsletter Fall 2012
- SA Newsletter Summer 2012
- SA Newsletter Spring 2012
- SA Newsletter Winter 2012
- SA Newsletter Fall 2011
- SA Newsletter Summer 2011
- SA Newsletter Spring 2011
- SA Newsletter Winter 2010-2011
- SA Newsletter Aug-Sept 2010
- SA Newsletter May-June 2010
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2010
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2009
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2009
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2009
- SA Newsletter May-June 2009
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2009
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2008
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2008
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2008
- SA Newsletter May-June 2008
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2008
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2008
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2007
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2007
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2007
- SA Newsletter May-June 2007
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2007
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2007
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2006
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2006
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2006
- SA Newsletter May-June 2006
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2006
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2006
- SA Newsletter Oct 2005
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2005
- SA Newsletter May-June 2005
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2005
- SA Newsletter Issue 2 2017
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2005
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2004
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2004
- SA Newsletter Jul-Aug 2004
- SA Newsletter June 2004
- SA Newsletter May 2004
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2004
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2004
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2003
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2003
- SA Newsletter Aug 2003
- SA Newsletter July 2003
- SA Newsletter June 2003
- SA Newsletter May 2003
- SA Newsletter April 2003
- SA Newsletter Mar 2003
- SA Newsletter Feb 2003
- SA Newsletter Jan 2003
- SA Newsletter Dec 2002
- SA Newsletter Nov 2002
- SA Newsletter Oct 2002
- SA Newsletter Sept 2002
- SA Newsletter Aug 2002
- SA Newsletter July 2002
- SA Newsletter June 2002
- SA Newsletter May 2002
- SA Newsletter April 2002
- SA Newsletter Mar 2002
- SA Newsletter Jan 2002
- SA Newsletter Dec 2001
- SA Newsletter Nov 2001
- SA Newsletter Oct 2001
- SA Newsletter Sept 2001
- SA Newsletter Aug 2001
- SA Newsletter July 2001
- SA Newsletter June 2001
- SA Newsletter May 2001
- SA Newsletter April 2001
- SA Newsletter Mar 2001
- SA Newsletter Jan 2001
- SA Newsletter Dec 2000
- SA Newsletter Nov 2000
- SA Newsletter Oct 2000
- SA Newsletter Sept 2000
- SA Newsletter Aug 2000
- SA Newsletter July 2000
- SA Newsletter June 2000
- SA Newsletter May 2000
- SA Newsletter April 2000
- SA Newsletter Mar 2000
- SA Newsletter April 1995
- SA Newsletter April 1996
- SA Newsletter April 1997
- SA Newsletter April 1998
- SA Newsletter April 1999
- SA Newsletter Aug 1995
- SA Newsletter Aug 1996
- SA Newsletter Aug 1997
- SA Newsletter Aug 1998
- SA Newsletter Aug 1999
- SA Newsletter Dec 1996
- SA Newsletter Dec 1998
- SA Newsletter Dec 1999
- SA Newsletter Feb 1995
- SA Newsletter Feb 1996
- SA Newsletter Feb 1997
- SA Newsletter Feb 1998
- SA Newsletter Feb 1999
- SA Newsletter Feb 2000
- SA Newsletter Feb 2001
- SA Newsletter Feb 2002
- SA Newsletter Jan 1996
- SA Newsletter Jan 1997
- SA Newsletter Jan 1998
- SA Newsletter Jan 1999
- SA Newsletter Jan 2000
- SA Newsletter July 1995
- SA Newsletter July 1996
- SA Newsletter July 1997
- SA Newsletter July 1998
- SA Newsletter July 1999
- SA Newsletter June 1995
- SA Newsletter June 1996
- SA Newsletter June 1997
- SA Newsletter June 1998
- SA Newsletter June 1999
- SA Newsletter Mar 1995
- SA Newsletter Mar 1996
- SA Newsletter Mar 1997
- SA Newsletter Mar 1998
- SA Newsletter Mar 1999
- SA Newsletter May 1995
- SA Newsletter May 1996
- SA Newsletter May 1997
- SA Newsletter May 1998
- SA Newsletter May 1999
- SA Newsletter Nov 1995
- SA Newsletter Nov 1996
- SA Newsletter Nov 1998
- SA Newsletter Nov 1999
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 1997
- SA Newsletter Oct 1995
- SA Newsletter Oct 1996
- SA Newsletter Oct 1997
- SA Newsletter Oct 1998
- SA Newsletter Oct 1999
- SA Newsletter Sept 1995
- SA Newsletter Sept 1996
- SA Newsletter Sept 1997
- SA Newsletter Sept 1998
- SA Newsletter Sept 1999

Sustainable Agriculture Newsletters Archive
College of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences
Volume 5 , Issue 1 – January 1997
Do you have a story you would like featured in the Sustainable Agriculture newsletter? Send your submission to misamail@umn.edu and we’ll consider adding it to an upcoming newsletter.
Lower diversification, higher variability increases grain supply risk
High-tech agriculture has brought with it high risk for most farmers. But the uncertainties of ag production now carry wider implications beyond the farm field, says a University of Minnesota economist.
According to Philip Raup, increasing dependency on three main crops and higher yield variability have resulted in more risky grain supplies for the U.S. and the world. “We’re living on a narrower margin from year to year,” says Raup.
Raup believes that grain growers have violated major rules of thumb in terms of diversification over the last several decades. Farmers are now putting more productive land into fewer crops. In the 1950’s, Minnesota farmers had 40 percent of their total acreage in corn, soybeans, and wheat. That figure has since risen to 75 percent.
At the same time, the state has witnessed a dramatic shift upward in the yield variability levels of these three crops. For example, in three instances over the last two decades, Minnesota corn production has dropped by around half when measured in three year periods. Raup says that this is unprecedented in modern agriculture, and that these trends hold true throughout the U.S.
The consequences are far-reaching. For individual farmers, greater variability makes it more difficult to decide on which crops to plant. It also means that they must set aside more of their income flow to cover the risk of a particularly bad harvest. “It’s as if you had a land tax increase,” observes Raup.
This variability can affect the domestic economy, as well. For example, bankers assume a constant risk when making their ag lending decisions. However, given the greater variability of the last two decades, Raup believes that their reserves to cover prospective risks are inadequate.
Likewise, U.S. coarse grain reserves have hit their lowest level ever. By the end of last year, supply stocks were down to between six and seven weeks. This is the amount of time that it would take the grain just to get through the supply pipeline. “Domestic food prices have generally held down inflation over the last three decades,” says Raup, “but that could change.”
Ultimately, international markets could suffer. The U.S. is the dominant coarse grain supplier to the world. As such, fluctuations in U.S. production could significantly affect global markets. For example, were a prolonged drought to hit a large section of the North American grain belt, Raup believes that the lack of alternative crops combined with low reserves would wreak greater havoc today than in the 1930’s. “Just-in-time production is risky when you’re trying to feed the world,” he says.
A copy of his paper, “Some Major Trends Affecting the Structure of Agriculture,” is available in Working Paper WP 96-4 from the Waite Library, 1994 Buford Avenue, 332 COB, St. Paul, MN 55108, (612) 625-1705.
New study shows less sediment and phosphorus entering Minnesota River
Farmers have reduced the amount of sediment and phosphorus entering the Minnesota River, according to a new University of Minnesota study. Producers have reduced erosion through earlier crop planting dates, conservation tillage and cropland retirement through the CRP program, according to David J. Mulla, a researcher with the university’s Agricultural Experiment Station.
In the study, scientists analyzed monthly sediment and phosphorus entering the Minnesota River during the 20-year period from 1974 to 1994. They adjusted their calculations to allow for wetter climates (more rain plus more intense, erosion-causing rainfalls) of the last few decades. While the wetter climate has actually increased sediment and phosphorus levels, the crop and land management practices adopted by farmers have “masked” reductions of the pollutants.
Most of the reductions in sediment and phosphorus came from the Blue Earth and Le Sueur watersheds. Most other watersheds showed small increases in phosphorus and sediment after allowing for climatic effects. In most cases, these increases were in watersheds with less conservation tillage.
“Results of this study show the importance of conservation tillage,” Mulla says. There’s a great variation in adoption rates for improved soil conservation practices throughout the Minnesota River basin. For example, in 1995 the percent of individual county acres with corn planted into 15 percent surface residue cover ranged from six to 51 percent, with an average of 28 percent.
Increased adoption of soil conservation practices can further accelerate the reduction in sediment loads to the Minnesota River. Efforts to accelerate the adoption of conservation practices should focus first on the most erodible land and steep lands near rivers, Mulla says.
Working with Mulla on the project were A. Mallawatanri, a research associate, and Mark Seeley, climatologist with the University of Minnesota’s Extension Service. For copies of their research paper, contact Professor David J. Mulla, 439 Borlaug Hall, 1529 Gortner Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108, (612) 625-6721.
Landscaping to make feedlots more attractive looking, possibly disperse odors
Landscaping around cattle and hog feedlots could do more than make the facilities more attractive. The windbreak effect could enhance energy efficiency while redirecting odors so neighbors get less of a whiff. Gary Wyatt, extension educator with the University of Minnesota’s Extension Service, says planning is underway to develop educational materials such as publications or web sites on landscaping livestock facilities.
Working on the project are a number of university colleges and departments, plus Branch Experiment Stations at Lamberton, Morris and Southwest State University, Marshall. The project is now in the planning stages. The idea that odors could be redirected is intriguing, but Wyatt says one issue being studied is how landscaping would affect “natural ventilation” buildings.
More information will be available after a planning conference at Southwest State University in Marshall Feb . 18. For more information, contact Wyatt at (507) 375-1275.
Applications for producer grant program available in early February
Farmers and ranchers interested in exploring new possibilities for higher profits, environmental stewardship, or community development have the opportunity to do so with funds for research and education projects from the USDA’s North Central Region (NCR) Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) Producer Grant Program.
“This is a very good program for farmers who want to make a change for the better,” says Joe Golimbieski, a Michigan farmer and Producer Grant recipient. “Farmers receiving the grant get help and in return they can help many other farmers from experience gained by the SARE grant work.” This year, $200,000 is available through this competitive grant program. The North Central Region will award up to $5,000 to individual producers investigating any sustainable practice or concept and up to $10,000 to groups of producers proposing creative marketing projects.
“Marketing in this age of competitive global food systems is more and more a necessary survival skill for farmers,” says Molly Bartlett, Ohio farmer and NCR SARE Administrative Council member. “With marketing knowledge, farmers are better able to seek out satisfying, profitable and regional markets.”
Applications are available from the North Central Region Office beginning Feb. 3, 1997. Producers must reside in the 12-state North Central Region: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota and Wisconsin. Applications are due May 1, 1997. Funding decisions will be made in late June 1997. Funds will be available in mid-fall for the 1998 crop production season. Call 402-274-7081 or e-mail sare001@unlvm.unl.edu for an application. Or, write North Central Region, SARE, 13A Activities Building, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0840.
The Producer Grant Program began in the North Central Region five years ago and is now a national SARE Program. Over 160 producer grants have been awarded in the NCR since the inception of this program. The national SARE Program began with the 1985 Farm Bill. Congress appropriated initial funds in 1988 for grants in sustainable agriculture research, education and demonstration. Funding goes to producers, scientists, educators and public and private institutions and organizations.
Whole farm planing report available from Minnesota Project
A report is now available that recommends just what whole farm planning ought to be. It articulates the consensus of a diverse group of 120 participants in the Great Lakes Basin Farm Planning Network. Farmers, nonprofit groups, researchers, and agency staff from seven Great Lakes states and Ontario are working together to explore, test, and evaluate different approaches to whole farm planning. The Minnesota Project coordinated the effort.
The report describes why there is so much interest in whole farm planning and what purposes it can serve. Nine of the best examples of whole farm planning programs are described. Successful Whole Farm Planning will be useful to policy makers, researchers, conservationists, farmers, and everyone interested in tools to help farmers shift to more sustainable farming systems.
Copies are available for $6.00 (includes shipping): The Minnesota Project, 1885 University Ave. West, Suite 315, St. Paul, MN 55104, (612)645-6159, Fax (612)645-1262. E-mail water007@gold.tc.umn.eduBy Loni Kemp, The Minnesota Project
Coming events…
January 30-Feb. 1, Minnesota Fruit & Vegetable Growers Annual Conference, St. Cloud. Contact Marilyn Nysetvold (612) 434-5929.
February 5-6, 22nd, Annual Forage Conference, Holiday Inn, Willmar. Emphasis is on production of alfalfa as a biomass fuel to product electricity and as a high protein animal feed. Contact your local Minnesota Extension Service office or the Minnesota Forage and Grassland Council at (612) 436-3930.
February 6-7, Farmer-Led Watershed Initiatives Conference, Mankato. Contact Jim Kleinschmidt, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) (612) 870-3421.
February 7-9, First annual gathering, Midwest Sustainable Agriculture Working Group, Des Moines, Iowa. Contact Mark Schultz LSP (612) 823-5221.
February 8, Cannon River SFA Annual Meeting, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., First United Church of Christ, Northfield. Speakers include Dick and Sharon Thompson plus Bob Quist from the Oliver Kelley Farm. Contact Ruth Coffing (612) 652-2243.
February 11, South Central SFA Annual Meeting, First Baptist Church, Clarks Grove. Business meeting at 5:30 p.m., meal and presentations 6 p.m. Contact Jim Tjepkema (507) 256-4876.
February 15, Central SFA Annual Meeting, Country Hearthside on Hwy. 27 between Little Falls and Long Prairie. Contact DeEtta Bilek (218) 445-5475.
February 21-22, Sustainable Farming Association of Minnesota Annual Meeting, Rochester. Contact Tim King (320) 732-6203.
March 2, Women in Agriculture Photo Exhibit, Northfield Art Guild, 304 Division St. S., Northfield. Sponsored by Women in Agriculture and the Minnesota Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (MISA) . Contact Diane Milan (507) 645-8282.
March 4-5, Strenghtening the Experiential Learning Process in Sustainable Agriculture, Sheraton Minneapolis Metrodome, Minneapolis. Hosted by the Department of Agronomy & Plant Genetics and Minnesota Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, University of Minnesota. Contact Juanita Reed-Boniface (612) 753-4636, agrifolks@aol.com or Darrell Cox (612) 625-2738, coxxx015@tc.umn.edu
March 4-6, HRM Training Session, Camphill Village, near Sauk Centre. Contact DeEtta Bilek (218) 445-5475.
March 18, Second Annual Flame Cultivation Round Table Dialogue, 9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. at St. Mary Catholic Church meeting room, 1303 W. Broadway, Winona, MN. Contact Dwight Ault (507) 437-3085 or Tom Wegner (612) 374-8437.
March 19-21, International Conference on Agricultural Production and Nutrition, Holiday Inn Boston-Brookline, Brookline, Massachusetts. Organized by Tufts University School of Nutrition Science and Policy and the Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture. Contact William Lockeretz (617) 627-3223, wlockeretz@infonet.tufts.edu
March 22, Restoring our Urban Waters, at First Universalist Society, 900 Mt. Curve Ave., Minneapolis. Contact Judith Lake of Citizens for a Better Environment, (612) 824-8637, ext. 222, cbelake@igc.apc.org
March 26, Sustainable Farming and Sustainable Communities, 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. at the Ramada Inn, Owatonna. Contact Tim Arlt (507) 444-7689, tarlt@extension.umn.edu
About this newsletter…
For the past year we’ve been funded by the Minnesota Extension Service and the Minnesota Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (MISA) with support from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture.
We’re always looking for story ideas. Send them to the editor: Jack Sperbeck, 405 Coffey Hall, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, (612) 625-1794. E-mail: jsperbeck@extension.umn.edu. Other editorial board members: Helene Murray (612) 625-0220, murra@021.tc.umn.edu; Tom Wegner (612) 374-8400, twegner@extension.umn.edu; and Bill Wilcke (612) 625-8205, wwilcke@extension.umn.edu
Our mission statement: To help bring people together to influence the future of agriculture and rural communities to achieve socially, environmentally and economically sustainable farms and communities.
The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation.