SA Newsletter May 2003
Sustainable Agriculture Newsletter
- SA Newsletter Archive
- SA Newsletter Issue 1 2017
- SA Newsletter -- Fall 2016
- SA Newsletter Spring 2016
- SA Newsletter Winter 2016
- SA Newsletter Spring 2015
- SA Newsletter Fall 2015
- SA Newsletter Summer 2015
- SA Newsletter Fall 2014
- SA Newsletter Spring 2014
- SA Newsletter Fall 2013
- SA Newsletter Spring 2013
- SA Newsletter Fall 2012
- SA Newsletter Summer 2012
- SA Newsletter Spring 2012
- SA Newsletter Winter 2012
- SA Newsletter Fall 2011
- SA Newsletter Summer 2011
- SA Newsletter Spring 2011
- SA Newsletter Winter 2010-2011
- SA Newsletter Aug-Sept 2010
- SA Newsletter May-June 2010
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2010
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2009
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2009
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2009
- SA Newsletter May-June 2009
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2009
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2008
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2008
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2008
- SA Newsletter May-June 2008
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2008
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2008
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2007
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2007
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2007
- SA Newsletter May-June 2007
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2007
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2007
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2006
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2006
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2006
- SA Newsletter May-June 2006
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2006
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2006
- SA Newsletter Oct 2005
- SA Newsletter July-Aug 2005
- SA Newsletter May-June 2005
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2005
- SA Newsletter Issue 2 2017
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2005
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2004
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2004
- SA Newsletter Jul-Aug 2004
- SA Newsletter June 2004
- SA Newsletter May 2004
- SA Newsletter Mar-Apr 2004
- SA Newsletter Jan-Feb 2004
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 2003
- SA Newsletter Sept-Oct 2003
- SA Newsletter Aug 2003
- SA Newsletter July 2003
- SA Newsletter June 2003
- SA Newsletter May 2003
- SA Newsletter April 2003
- SA Newsletter Mar 2003
- SA Newsletter Feb 2003
- SA Newsletter Jan 2003
- SA Newsletter Dec 2002
- SA Newsletter Nov 2002
- SA Newsletter Oct 2002
- SA Newsletter Sept 2002
- SA Newsletter Aug 2002
- SA Newsletter July 2002
- SA Newsletter June 2002
- SA Newsletter May 2002
- SA Newsletter April 2002
- SA Newsletter Mar 2002
- SA Newsletter Jan 2002
- SA Newsletter Dec 2001
- SA Newsletter Nov 2001
- SA Newsletter Oct 2001
- SA Newsletter Sept 2001
- SA Newsletter Aug 2001
- SA Newsletter July 2001
- SA Newsletter June 2001
- SA Newsletter May 2001
- SA Newsletter April 2001
- SA Newsletter Mar 2001
- SA Newsletter Jan 2001
- SA Newsletter Dec 2000
- SA Newsletter Nov 2000
- SA Newsletter Oct 2000
- SA Newsletter Sept 2000
- SA Newsletter Aug 2000
- SA Newsletter July 2000
- SA Newsletter June 2000
- SA Newsletter May 2000
- SA Newsletter April 2000
- SA Newsletter Mar 2000
- SA Newsletter April 1995
- SA Newsletter April 1996
- SA Newsletter April 1997
- SA Newsletter April 1998
- SA Newsletter April 1999
- SA Newsletter Aug 1995
- SA Newsletter Aug 1996
- SA Newsletter Aug 1997
- SA Newsletter Aug 1998
- SA Newsletter Aug 1999
- SA Newsletter Dec 1996
- SA Newsletter Dec 1998
- SA Newsletter Dec 1999
- SA Newsletter Feb 1995
- SA Newsletter Feb 1996
- SA Newsletter Feb 1997
- SA Newsletter Feb 1998
- SA Newsletter Feb 1999
- SA Newsletter Feb 2000
- SA Newsletter Feb 2001
- SA Newsletter Feb 2002
- SA Newsletter Jan 1996
- SA Newsletter Jan 1997
- SA Newsletter Jan 1998
- SA Newsletter Jan 1999
- SA Newsletter Jan 2000
- SA Newsletter July 1995
- SA Newsletter July 1996
- SA Newsletter July 1997
- SA Newsletter July 1998
- SA Newsletter July 1999
- SA Newsletter June 1995
- SA Newsletter June 1996
- SA Newsletter June 1997
- SA Newsletter June 1998
- SA Newsletter June 1999
- SA Newsletter Mar 1995
- SA Newsletter Mar 1996
- SA Newsletter Mar 1997
- SA Newsletter Mar 1998
- SA Newsletter Mar 1999
- SA Newsletter May 1995
- SA Newsletter May 1996
- SA Newsletter May 1997
- SA Newsletter May 1998
- SA Newsletter May 1999
- SA Newsletter Nov 1995
- SA Newsletter Nov 1996
- SA Newsletter Nov 1998
- SA Newsletter Nov 1999
- SA Newsletter Nov-Dec 1997
- SA Newsletter Oct 1995
- SA Newsletter Oct 1996
- SA Newsletter Oct 1997
- SA Newsletter Oct 1998
- SA Newsletter Oct 1999
- SA Newsletter Sept 1995
- SA Newsletter Sept 1996
- SA Newsletter Sept 1997
- SA Newsletter Sept 1998
- SA Newsletter Sept 1999

College of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences
Volume 11, Issue 5 – May 2003
Do you have a story you would like featured in the Sustainable Agriculture newsletter? Send your submission to misamail@umn.edu and we’ll consider adding it to an upcoming newsletter.
New agreement will enhance Minnesota's organic agriculture sector
Minnesota leads the nation in production of organic corn and soybeans and boasts more certified organic acreage than all but five other states. The state's organic agriculture sector has grown rapidly in recent years, but industry watchers see room for even more growth.
To help make that happen, five state and federal partners recently signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in which the organizations agreed to work together to enhance the productivity, profitability and economic opportunities of Minnesota's organic agriculture industry. This organic partnership is the first of its kind in the country.
The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA); the University of Minnesota College of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences; the University of Minnesota Extension Service; and the Minnesota offices of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service and USDA Farm Service Agency each provide important services to organic farmers in the state. By signing this MOU, each agency is making greater coordination of these outreach efforts possible.
"Organic agriculture is an important and growing part of Minnesota's farm economy," MDA Commissioner Gene Hugoson says. "We each do our part to help Minnesota maintain and build on its leadership status in organic production. By more closely coordinating our efforts, each of us will have a greater impact than we would have working individually."
The MOU partners recognize that organics are a choice preferred by a growing number of farmers and consumers, and will undertake complementary efforts to assist organic producers' efforts to improve profitability, identify new market opportunities and conserve natural resources. The agencies will focus on activities including:
- Developing and implementing conservation farm plans for organic crop production;
- Providing staff support for organic professional development, service delivery and outreach efforts;
- Sharing information about innovative organic programs taking place in other states or countries; and
- Encouraging the use of demonstrations and field days with organic field operations to showcase conservation and organic production.
"The University of Minnesota serves all the farmers in the state," says Charles Muscoplat, dean of the College of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences. "We are happy to work closely with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and USDA to provide the information needed to enhance the productivity, profitability and environmental responsibility of all farmers in the state.
"We're leaders in organic research," Muscoplat says. "Our Elwell agroecology farm has 160 acres devoted to organic research, and 130 of those are certified organic acres. That's 80 percent of all certified organic research acres at land grant universities in the U.S.
"We provide farmers the information needed to make decisions about how to raise their crops," Muscoplat adds. "One example is the Variable Input Crop Management System research project at the University's Southwest Research and Outreach Center. This is a long-term study that looks at ways to minimize input use while maintaining productivity and profitability.
"We're also partners in Minnesota Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, which provides a powerful catalyst for encouraging research and discussion about sustainable agriculture."
A complete listing of organic-related websites is available through the MDA site at www.mda.state.mn.us/esap/organic.
Precision Agriculture for everyone?
Have you read about precision agriculture and concluded that you could never afford to do it? Some of the farming magazine articles about precision agriculture make it sound like you need tractors with onboard computers and GPS units, harvesters with yield monitors, and soil sampling of your entire farm on a grid pattern. Take heart: a new technical note from Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), "Affordable Opportunities for Precision Agriculture," tells how to do precision agriculture on your farm with tools no more sophisticated than photocopied maps, transparency sheets and felt-tip markers.
The most important tools for precision agriculture are your brain and your eyes, not the computer and GPS. This new publication from NRCS is intended to help farmers who may or may not own a computer, but who are interested in long-term management strategies for improving their farms. The experiences of a number of farmers from around the United States are included to show ways that you can map variability on your farm; and then use varying management techniques to deal with the variations in soil, slope, drainage and other factors.
Yield monitoring without expensive yield monitors is also covered in this technical note. There are ways to do some simple yield testing to find out if your precision management is working. The publication states, " Farmers who check site-specific yields soon realize that looks can be deceiving. Grain yield does not always match how quickly the crop got started in the spring or how tall, dense, or green the crop looks at the end of the season."
Thinking in terms of precision agriculture is one part of a farming system that may also include crop rotation, integrated pest management, use of fertilizers and pesticides, or any number of other management techniques and inputs. The techniques outlined in "Affordable Opportunities for Precision Agriculture" are designed to help farmers make the most judicious use of their labor and inputs-and that is something to interest any sustainable farmer.
Affordable Opportunities for Precision Agriculture can be found online at: policy.nrcs.usda.gov/scripts/lpsiis.dll/TN/TN_SA_1_A.pdf
Or contact your local NRCS office to ask for a print copy. Find the office in your county at: offices.usda.gov/scripts/ndISAPI.dll/oip_public/pgCountyMap?st=MN&state_name=Minnesota&st_cd=27
--By Jane Jewett
Finding options for organic poultry feed
Ever wonder why the cost of organic meat is so high? The answer is simple: it's expensive to give an animal organic feed. Jacquie Jacob, a poultry nutritionist at the University of Minnesota, is studying organic poultry diets, looking to find nutritional options that are simultaneously economically feasible for farmers.
More and more small crop farms are switching over to organic crop production and are growing alternative crops in crop rotations as part of their new practice. The main challenge to this system? There are no strong markets in place for nontraditional crops such as oats, buckwheat, rye, flax, and field peas. For Jacob, that's precisely where poultry feed comes in.
"Organic poultry is a niche market in which small-farm operators have a competitive edge," Jacob explains. The opportunity exists for both poultry and crop producers to benefit from each other. The missing link, then, is to research nutritious options for organic poultry feed.
Finding the best nutritive option is complicated. No one crop is perfect: oats are too fibrous, rye inhibits growth, wheat slows digestion, and so on. Flax seed, wondrously high in protein and in oil, affects egg flavor when used as more than 10 percent of the feed. "Each one of them has something," explains Jacob. The challenge becomes finding a diet that is high in protein and essential amino acids, and minimizes the effect of the anti-nutritive aspects of each crop.
"For traditional feed, there's a very strong database of nutrition information," says Jacob. "We don't have that kind of nutritional information for organic feeds." That's where Jacob's work, which has received a USDA grant, begins. She and graduate student Allegra Toll will test organic crops for nutrient availability, and design and test poultry feeds on both broiler and layers. "We're just trying to help out those farmers who are choosing to go organic and find nutritionally and economically feasible options for them," she says.
For information on poultry nutrition:
www.ansci.umn.edu/poultry/resources/nutrition.htm
For information on organic poultry production:
www.ansci.umn.edu/poultry/links/organicproduction-links.htm
Jacquie Jacob's web page:
www.ansci.umn.edu/faculty/jacob.htm
--By Daniel Ungier, MISA intern
State of Michigan bars herbicide linked to water pollution
Michigan has barred use on cornfields this year of a herbicide that has been blamed for contaminated water in other states. The Michigan Department of Agriculture rejected a request to allow Balance Pro use on the state's 2.2 million acres of corn this spring, Deputy Director of Agriculture Keith Creagh says.
Agriculture Director Dan Wyant followed a staff recommendation that warned of the product's potential risks. Those included contamination of surface and groundwater, its classification as a probable human carcinogen and the state's inability to monitor the product's active chemical, isoxaflutole, the Detroit Free Press said.
Michigan also declined to approve the herbicide in 2001 and 2002, saying there was insufficient testing data. Michigan could approve the use of Balance Pro next year if the company and state are able to create a program to teach farmers how to use the product without damaging the environment, Creagh says. Officials also would want to see additional test results and would need to upgrade their ability to analyze the product's environmental impact, he says.
Balance Pro is used in 17 states and has been detected in streams in several of them, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Lakes and reservoir samples in Nebraska and Missouri continued to show levels of Balance metabolites, some as late as 10 months after a single application," Kenneth Rauscher, director of the Pesticide and Plant Management Division of the Michigan Agriculture Department, wrote to Balance Pro's manufacturer, Bayer Crop Science.
The company has said there is no danger to groundwater and minimal concern over the chemical's accumulation in the environment. Levels of the herbicide found in Nebraska have been well below those that would signal any danger to health, says Tim Creger, pesticide program manager for Nebraska's Department of Agriculture.
Monitoring by the state and careful application by farmers have further reduced residual levels of the chemical, Creger says.
Last year, Wisconsin approved its use but with so many restrictions that the manufacturer decided not to sell it there. Minnesota also imposed severe restrictions on its use.
Sustainable agriculture program calls for grant preproposals
Members of institutions and organizations from the North Central Region are invited to apply for 2004 Research and Education Grants through the North Central Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (NCR-SARE) program. NCR-SARE estimates that about $1.5 million will be available for 10 to 15 grants by the summer of 2004. Individual grants cannot exceed $150,000.
Grants can be one to three years in length and must address sustainable agricultural topics with in-depth research or education/demonstration projects. Successful preproposals will address the long-term enhancement of agricultural profitability, environmental quality and societal well-being.
"We are pleased that interested citizens and the federal government support the SARE program and make these funds available for research and education projects that will make agriculture more sustainable," says Bill Wilcke, regional coordinator for the NCR-SARE program. Wilcke is also an engineer with the University of Minnesota Extension Service.
NCR-SARE encourages projects that include holistic approaches, interdisciplinary team involvement, agricultural producer participation, significant outreach and measurable results. Projects should pertain to issues within the North Central Region.
The call for preproposals is available at the NCR-SARE office at (402) 472-7081 or through its website at www.sare.org/ncrsare. Preproposals will be accepted in the NCR-SARE office until June 10, 2003, at 4:30 p.m. CDT. Successful preproposal authors will be invited to submit full proposals due fall 2003.
The Research and Education Grant Program is one of four NCR-SARE grant programs. It funds collaborative teams of scientists, farmers, educators, institutions and organizations to explore sustainable agriculture through research, education or demonstration.
NCR-SARE is a competitive grants program, funded by the U. S. Department of Agriculture, which strengthens rural communities, increases farmer/rancher profitability and improves environmental quality by supporting research and education. States included in the North Central Region are North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana and Ohio.
What we're about
This newsletter is supported by the Minnesota Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (MISA). It's also supported by the University of Minnesota Extension Service, the North Central Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (NCRSARE) Professional Development Program (PDP), and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA). MISA is a partnership between the Sustainer's Coalition and the University of Minnesota College of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences (COAFES).
Send story ideas to the editor: Jack Sperbeck, 405 Coffey Hall, 1420 Eckles Ave., University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, (612) 625-1794, fax (612) 625-2207, e-mail: sperb001@umn.edu. Other editorial board members: Helene Murray, (612) 625-0220, murra021@umn.edu; and Bill Wilcke, (612) 625-8205, wilck001@umn.edu. Please send address changes directly to: Bill Wilcke, Biosystems & Agricultural Engineering, 1390 Eckles Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108.
Also check MISA's home page at www.misa.umn.edu.
Our mission statement: To help bring people together to influence the future of agriculture and rural communities to achieve socially, environmentally, and economically sustainable farms and communities.
To stimulate thinking and discussion about sustainability, we try to present items that reflect different points of view. This being the case, we aren't promoting and don't necessarily agree with everything we publish.
The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation.